Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] spi: cadence-qspi: add early busywait to cqspi_wait_for_bit()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 04:42:43PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 4:16 PM CEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:02:18PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:

> > > The reason is to avoid hrtimer interrupts on the system. All read
> > > operations take less than 100µs.

> > Why would this be platform specific, this seems like a very standard
> > optimisation technique?

> It does not make sense if you know that all read operations take more
> than 100µs. I preferred being conservative. If you confirm it makes
> sense I'll remove the quirk.

It does seem plausible at least, and the time could be made a tuneable
with quirks or otherwise if that's needed.  I think I'd expect the MIPS
platform you're working with to be towards the lower end of performance
for systems that are new enough to have this hardware.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux