Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: Add qca,qca4024

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/02/2024 23:01, frut3k7 wrote:
> The device I use has the QCA4024 chip connected via the spi controller:
>         blsp1_spi4: spi@78b8000 {
>             compatible = "qcom,spi-qup-v2.2.1";
>             #address-cells = <1>;
>             #size-cells = <0>;
>             reg = <0x78b8000 0x600>;
>             interrupts = <GIC_SPI 98 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>             clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_QUP4_SPI_APPS_CLK>,
>                  <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>;
>             clock-names = "core", "iface";
>             dmas = <&blsp_dma 18>, <&blsp_dma 19>;
>             dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>             status = "disabled";
>         };
> 
> and apart from setting the frequency and gpio there is nothing else:
>         &blsp1_spi4 {
>             status = "okay";
> 
>             pinctrl-0 = <&spi_3_pins &quartz_pins>;
>             pinctrl-names = "default";
> 
>             /* Qualcomm QCA4024 IoT */
>             iot@3 {
>                 compatible = "qca,qca4024";
>                 reg = <0>;
>                 spi-max-frequency = <24000000>;

That's your downstream or fork DTS, not hardware description. You could
have several regulators not listed here, because your downstream has
always-on, or clocks which are not taken and works due to
assigned-clocks in other places... Sorry, that's not an argument. Never
use downstream DTS as proof how hardware looks. It is usually dis-proof,
that things are certainly missing.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux