On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:43:55PM +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote: > On Feb 09, 2024 at 14:51:23 +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote: > > + /* > > + * We do not have the concept of messages or transfers. Let's consider > > + * that one operation is equivalent to one message and one transfer. > Why 1 message _and_ 1 xfer and not simply 1 xfer? > Even in the example of testing that you showed above the values for > message and xfer are anyway going to be same, then why have these 2 > members in the first place? Can we not do away with one of these? If the device supports regular SPI operations as well as spi-mem operations then this will ensure that the spi-mem stats fit in with the other operations. If it only supports spi-mem operations it would not matter so much.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
