On 1/18/24 12:42, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 08:30:39AM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote: >> On 1/12/24 18:37, Mark Brown wrote: > >>>> [ 6748.913400] spi-loopback-test spi13.0: elapsed time 532837 ns is >>>> shorter than minimum estimated time 82240000 ns > >>> That's a *very* substantial error, it makes me suspect that the hardware >>> might be doing loopback at a stage before it actually clocks the bus and >>> doing something like just connecting the TX and RX FIFOs. > >> Thanks, Mark! It was a problem on how the clocks were handled, I ended >> up with a higher frequency than I requested. > > Ouch, hopefully that's only affecting loopback mode and not normal > operation for everyone. It was a problem on the clock driver which is not yet upstream. SPI is fine, in loopback mode at least, that's all I could test for now.