On Sep 26, 2023 at 14:48:27 +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:49:08PM +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote: > > > Umm I don't think the commit being fixed is there in 6.6? > > I am not really sure how I should base/format the patch? Please can you > > tell me what's expected in such a case ideally? > > Including a full 12 character commit hash would help with matching, I have given the full 12 chars, else checkpatch would've caught me :) > there were only 10 there. Not mix'n'matching Link:/Close: with links in > the body of the commit message would help as well. OK, I have fixed the links and sent the patch V3 Again, I have based on your for-next, as I don't see the fixes: commit in the 6.6 tree. -- Best regards, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>