Re: [PATCH v3 00/50] Add support for sam9x7 SoC family

[Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:04:43PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> conor@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:50:24 +0100:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 28/07/2023 12:22, Varshini Rajendran wrote:  
> > > > This patch series adds support for the new SoC family - sam9x7.
> > > >  - The device tree, configs and drivers are added
> > > >  - Clock driver for sam9x7 is added
> > > >  - Support for basic peripherals is added
> > > >  - Target board SAM9X75 Curiosity is added
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > Your threading is absolutely broken making it difficult to review and apply.  
> > 
> > I had a chat with Varshini today, they were trying to avoid sending the
> > patches to a massive CC list, but didn't set any in-reply-to header.
> > For the next submission whole series could be sent to the binding &
> > platform maintainers and the individual patches additionally to their
> > respective lists/maintainers. Does that sound okay to you, or do you
> > think it should be broken up?
> 
> I usually prefer receiving the dt-bindings *and* the driver changes, so
> I can give my feedback on the description side, as well as looking at
> the implementation and see if that really matches what was discussed
> with you :)

Right, that is what I was suggesting. Respective maintainers would get
the drivers *and* bindings for their subsystems - IOW, each patch is
sent to what get_maintainer.pl outputs for it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature