Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: pwm: restrict node name suffixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/06/2023 09:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 04:48:46PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Make the pattern matching node names a bit stricter to improve DTS
>> consistency.  The pattern is restricted to:
>> 1. Only one unit address or one -N suffix,
>> 2. -N suffixes to decimal numbers.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml
>> index 3c01f85029e5..abd9fa873354 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml
>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ select: false
>>  
>>  properties:
>>    $nodename:
>> -    pattern: "^pwm(@.*|-[0-9a-f])*$"
>> +    pattern: "^pwm(@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?$"
> 
> With this patch we forbid now the following patterns:
> 
> 	pwm-[0-9a-f][@-].*
> 	pwm-0[0-9a-f]+
> 	pwm-[a-f]([@-].*)?

Yes, this was discussed last time:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221127182232.GA128974-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/

> 
> Checking for such names:
> 
> 	$ git grep -oP '\bpwm-([0-9a-f][@-].*|0[0-9a-f]+|[0-9]*[a-f][0-9a-f]*)(*pla:\s*\{)' arch/*/boot/dts
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/meson8.dtsi:pwm-f-ao
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/meson8.dtsi:pwm-e
> 	arch/arm/boot/dts/meson8b.dtsi:pwm-d
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-a
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-b-x7
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-b-x19
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-c-c
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-c-x5
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-c-x8
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-d-x3
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-d-x6
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-e
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-f-z
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-f-a
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-f-x
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-f-h
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi:pwm-a-e

Are you sure these are pwms, not pins?

> 
> These are all pinmux-settings and no pwm nodes, so the change is fine.
> (But arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi isn't properly
> sorted alphabetically.)

Exactly...

> 
> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux