Re: [BUG] microchip-spi programming issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:02PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:

> Following on from that, how strong is "normally" in the comment above?
> Is it valid for a controller to deassert CS even if cs_change is not
> set? Or have I totally misunderstood things and there's something
> invalid about how the transfers are being set up in the driver?

It is obviously going to corrupt the transfer if we deassert chip select
without being asked, it is only valid to change it during a message if
cs_change is set.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux