On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:02PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > Following on from that, how strong is "normally" in the comment above? > Is it valid for a controller to deassert CS even if cs_change is not > set? Or have I totally misunderstood things and there's something > invalid about how the transfers are being set up in the driver? It is obviously going to corrupt the transfer if we deassert chip select without being asked, it is only valid to change it during a message if cs_change is set.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
