On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:10:29PM +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote: > Add the Loongson platform spi binding with DT schema format using > json-schema. > > Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/spi/loongson,ls2k-spi.yaml | 41 +++++++++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 6 +++ > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/loongson,ls2k-spi.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/loongson,ls2k-spi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/loongson,ls2k-spi.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..d0be6e5378d7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/loongson,ls2k-spi.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spi/loongson,ls2k-spi.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Loongson SPI controller > + > +maintainers: > + - Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-controller.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - loongson,ls2k-spi I am sorry to jump in here at such a late stage with a (potentially) trivial question. "ls2k" is the SoC family rather than a specific model as far as I understand. The answer is probably yes, but do all SoCs in the family have an identical version of the IP? Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
