On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:37:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Personally I would go for [0] as the least invasive solution, but I really > have no idea, sorry. I just hope that your (broken) patch doesn't make it > as-is into the upstream kernel. I've applied the SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS patch which seems to fix the issue for riscv.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
