Re: [PATCH] spi: davinci: Remove dead code in `davinci_spi_probe()`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 08:03:42PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> On 2023/4/24 19:48, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Is that check valid?  0 was a valid interrupt for some architectures...

> We just follow the comments of platform_get_irq().

>  * Gets an IRQ for a platform device and prints an error message if finding
> the
>  * IRQ fails. Device drivers should check the return value for errors so as
> to
>  * not pass a negative integer value to the request_irq() APIs.

I'm not sure that's universally true yet, though there were some moves
to try to get us there.  arm, where this driver is used, was one of the
platforms with 0 as a valid interrupt.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux