Re: [PATCH v10 10/15] spi: dw: Add support for AMD Pensando Elba SoC

[Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:59:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 6:00 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 08:07:34PM -0800, Brad Larson wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > -     node = of_parse_phandle(np, syscon_name, 0);
> >
> >         node = of_parse_phandle(dev_of_node(pdev->dev), syscon_name, 0);
> 

> Side note: I would rather see syscon_fwnode_to_regmap() instead of
> this. And IIRC syscon already has an API to find by name.

Ah, right. Though it's called syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() and it
can be used to replace the entire pattern: "Parse property; Find node
by phandle; Get regmap by node". Basically the of_parse_phandle() and
syscon_node_to_regmap() methods invocation can be replaced with just a
single function call. Thus there won't be need to worry about
decrementing the found DT-node ref-counter.

> 
> > > +     if (!node)
> >
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV, "failed to find %s\n",
> > > +                                  syscon_name);
> >
> > Hm, using dev_err_probe() with known error value seems overkill.
> 

> It's allowed use and it helps to drop a few unnecessary lines of code.

Ok, seeing there is no alternative to that method which would return
the passed error but wouldn't have a name implying the silent
deferred-probe error semantics.

-Serge(y)

> 
> > > +     syscon = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
> > > +     if (IS_ERR(syscon))
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(syscon),
> > > +                                  "syscon regmap lookup failed\n");
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko