> -----Original Message----- > From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 28 February 2023 08:06 > To: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; peterhuewe@xxxxxx; > jgg@xxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Hunter > <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sowjanya Komatineni > <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Patch V5 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Support hardware wait polling > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 05:37:01PM +0530, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote: > > TPM devices raise wait signal on last addr cycle. This can be detected > > by software driver by reading MISO line on same clock which requires > > full duplex support. In case of half duplex controllers wait detection > > has to be implemented in HW. > > Support hardware wait state detection by sending entire message and let > > controller handle flow control. > > When a is started sentence with the word "support" it translates to "I'm > too lazy to write a proper and verbose description of the implementation" > :-) > > It has some abstract ideas of the implementation, I give you that, but do > you think anyone ever will get any value of reading that honestly? A bit > more concrette description of the change helps e.g. when bisecting bugs. > I presented why we are making the change. Will add explanation on how it is implemented as well. > > QSPI controller in Tegra236 & Tegra241 implement TPM wait polling. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c | 92 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c > > index a0963a3e92bd..5f66448ee09e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c > > @@ -71,8 +71,74 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_flow_control(struct > tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy, > > return 0; > > } > > > > -int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len, > > - u8 *in, const u8 *out) > > +/* > > + * Half duplex controller with support for TPM wait state detection like > > + * Tegra241 need cmd, addr & data sent in single message to manage HW > flow > > + * control. Each phase sent in different transfer for controller to idenity > > + * phase. > > + */ > > +int tpm_tis_spi_hw_flow_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, > u16 len, > > + u8 *in, const u8 *out) > > +{ > > + struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data); > > + struct spi_transfer spi_xfer[3]; > > + struct spi_message m; > > + u8 transfer_len; > > + int ret; > > + > > + while (len) { > > + transfer_len = min_t(u16, len, MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE); > > + > > + spi_message_init(&m); > > + phy->iobuf[0] = (in ? 0x80 : 0) | (transfer_len - 1); > > + phy->iobuf[1] = 0xd4; > > + phy->iobuf[2] = addr >> 8; > > + phy->iobuf[3] = addr; > > + > > + memset(&spi_xfer, 0, sizeof(spi_xfer)); > > + > > + spi_xfer[0].tx_buf = phy->iobuf; > > + spi_xfer[0].len = 1; > > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[0], &m); > > + > > + spi_xfer[1].tx_buf = phy->iobuf + 1; > > + spi_xfer[1].len = 3; > > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[1], &m); > > + > > + if (out) { > > + spi_xfer[2].tx_buf = &phy->iobuf[4]; > > + spi_xfer[2].rx_buf = NULL; > > + memcpy(&phy->iobuf[4], out, transfer_len); > > + out += transfer_len; > > + } > > + > > + if (in) { > > + spi_xfer[2].tx_buf = NULL; > > + spi_xfer[2].rx_buf = &phy->iobuf[4]; > > + } > > + > > + spi_xfer[2].len = transfer_len; > > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[2], &m); > > + > > + reinit_completion(&phy->ready); > > + > > + ret = spi_sync_locked(phy->spi_device, &m); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (in) { > > + memcpy(in, &phy->iobuf[4], transfer_len); > > + in += transfer_len; > > + } > > + > > + len -= transfer_len; > > + } > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +int tpm_tis_spi_sw_flow_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, > u16 len, > > + u8 *in, const u8 *out) > > { > > struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data); > > int ret = 0; > > @@ -140,6 +206,28 @@ int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data > *data, u32 addr, u16 len, > > return ret; > > } > > > > +int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len, > > + u8 *in, const u8 *out) > > +{ > > + struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data); > > + struct spi_controller *ctlr = phy->spi_device->controller; > > + > > + /* > > + * TPM flow control over SPI requires full duplex support. > > + * Send entire message to a half duplex controller to handle > > + * wait polling in controller. > > + * Set TPM HW flow control flag.. > > + */ > > + if (ctlr->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_HALF_DUPLEX) { > > + phy->spi_device->mode |= SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW; > > + return tpm_tis_spi_hw_flow_transfer(data, addr, len, in, > > + out); > > + } else { > > + return tpm_tis_spi_sw_flow_transfer(data, addr, len, in, > > + out); > > + } > > +} > > + > > static int tpm_tis_spi_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, > > u16 len, u8 *result, enum tpm_tis_io_mode io_mode) > > { > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > Looking pretty good but do you really want to export > tpm_tis_spi_{hw,sw}_flow_transfer? > > BR, Jarkko No need to export tpm_tis_spi_{hw,sw}_flow_transfer as well. I will update this in next version. KY