On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:47:48PM +0530, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote: > Tegra234 and Tegra241 chips have QSPI controller that supports TCG > TIS hardware flow control. Since the controller only supports half > duplex, sw wait polling method implemented in tpm_tis_spi does not > suffice. Added extending driver to disable sw flow control and send s/Added/Add/ > all transfers in single message. I've never heard the term "extended driver" before. > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/char/tpm/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h | 1 + > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c | 4 +- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_tegra.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_tegra.c > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile b/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile > index 0222b1ddb310..445b15493cb3 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_SYNQUACER) += tpm_tis_synquacer.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_SPI) += tpm_tis_spi.o > tpm_tis_spi-y := tpm_tis_spi_main.o > +tpm_tis_spi-y += tpm_tis_spi_tegra.o > tpm_tis_spi-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_SPI_CR50) += tpm_tis_spi_cr50.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_I2C_CR50) += tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.o > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h > index d0f66f6f1931..feaea14b428b 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.h > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ extern int tpm_tis_spi_init(struct spi_device *spi, struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy, > extern int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len, > u8 *in, const u8 *out); > > +extern int tegra_tpm_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi); > #ifdef CONFIG_TCG_TIS_SPI_CR50 > extern int cr50_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi); > #else > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c > index a0963a3e92bd..5d4502a4461a 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c > @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_driver_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > const struct spi_device_id *spi_dev_id = spi_get_device_id(spi); > tpm_tis_spi_probe_func probe_func; > > - probe_func = of_device_get_match_data(&spi->dev); > + probe_func = device_get_match_data(&spi->dev); > if (!probe_func) { > if (spi_dev_id) { > probe_func = (tpm_tis_spi_probe_func)spi_dev_id->driver_data; > @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id tpm_tis_spi_id[] = { > { "tpm_tis_spi", (unsigned long)tpm_tis_spi_probe }, > { "tpm_tis-spi", (unsigned long)tpm_tis_spi_probe }, > { "cr50", (unsigned long)cr50_spi_probe }, > + { "tegra-tpm-spi", (unsigned long)tegra_tpm_spi_probe }, > {} > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, tpm_tis_spi_id); > @@ -236,6 +237,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_tis_spi_match[] = { > { .compatible = "infineon,slb9670", .data = tpm_tis_spi_probe }, > { .compatible = "tcg,tpm_tis-spi", .data = tpm_tis_spi_probe }, > { .compatible = "google,cr50", .data = cr50_spi_probe }, > + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra-tpm-spi", .data = tegra_tpm_spi_probe }, > {} > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_tis_spi_match); > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_tegra.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_tegra.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..23f20684513d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_tegra.c > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2023 NVIDIA CORPORATION. > + * > + * This device driver implements TEGRA QSPI hw wait detection for chips > + * > + * It is based on tpm_tis_spi driver by Peter Huewe and Christophe Ricard. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/completion.h> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/pm.h> > +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > +#include <linux/wait.h> > + > +#include "tpm_tis_core.h" > +#include "tpm_tis_spi.h" > + > +#define MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE 64 > + > +int tpm_tis_spi_tegra_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len, > + u8 *in, const u8 *out) > +{ > + struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data); > + int ret = 0; Why do you need to initialize ret? > + struct spi_message m; > + struct spi_transfer spi_xfer[3]; > + u8 transfer_len; Please reorder declarations to reverse christmas tree order. > + > + spi_bus_lock(phy->spi_device->master); > + > + while (len) { > + transfer_len = min_t(u16, len, MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE); > + > + spi_message_init(&m); > + phy->iobuf[0] = (in ? 0x80 : 0) | (transfer_len - 1); > + phy->iobuf[1] = 0xd4; > + phy->iobuf[2] = addr >> 8; > + phy->iobuf[3] = addr; > + > + memset(&spi_xfer, 0, sizeof(spi_xfer)); > + > + spi_xfer[0].tx_buf = phy->iobuf; > + spi_xfer[0].len = 1; > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[0], &m); > + > + spi_xfer[1].tx_buf = phy->iobuf + 1; > + spi_xfer[1].len = 3; > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[1], &m); > + > + if (out) { > + spi_xfer[2].tx_buf = &phy->iobuf[4]; > + spi_xfer[2].rx_buf = NULL; > + memcpy(&phy->iobuf[4], out, transfer_len); > + out += transfer_len; > + } Empty line here. > + if (in) { > + spi_xfer[2].tx_buf = NULL; > + spi_xfer[2].rx_buf = &phy->iobuf[4]; > + } Ditto. > + spi_xfer[2].len = transfer_len; > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[2], &m); > + > + reinit_completion(&phy->ready); Ditto. > + ret = spi_sync_locked(phy->spi_device, &m); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto exit; > + > + if (in) { > + memcpy(in, &phy->iobuf[4], transfer_len); > + in += transfer_len; > + } > + > + len -= transfer_len; > + } > + > +exit: > + spi_bus_unlock(phy->spi_device->master); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int tpm_tis_spi_tegra_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, > + u16 len, u8 *result, > + enum tpm_tis_io_mode io_mode) > +{ > + return tpm_tis_spi_tegra_transfer(data, addr, len, result, NULL); > +} > + > +static int tpm_tis_spi_tegra_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, > + u16 len, const u8 *value, > + enum tpm_tis_io_mode io_mode) > +{ > + return tpm_tis_spi_tegra_transfer(data, addr, len, NULL, value); > +} > + > +static const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops tegra_tpm_spi_phy_ops = { > + .read_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_tegra_read_bytes, > + .write_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_tegra_write_bytes, > +}; > + > +int tegra_tpm_spi_probe(struct spi_device *dev) > +{ > + struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy; > + int irq; > + > + phy = devm_kzalloc(&dev->dev, sizeof(struct tpm_tis_spi_phy), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!phy) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + phy->flow_control = NULL; > + > + /* If the SPI device has an IRQ then use that */ > + if (dev->irq > 0) > + irq = dev->irq; > + else > + irq = -1; > + > + init_completion(&phy->ready); > + return tpm_tis_spi_init(dev, phy, irq, &tegra_tpm_spi_phy_ops); > +} > -- > 2.17.1 > BR, Jarkko