Re: [PATCH 000/606] i2c: Complete conversion to i2c_probe_new
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/606] i2c: Complete conversion to i2c_probe_new
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:16:54 +0100
- Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chrome-platform@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-actions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@xxxxxxxxx>, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rpi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-amlogic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Purism Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxx>, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20221122185818.3740200d@jic23-huawei>
- References: <20221118224540.619276-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org> <20221122185818.3740200d@jic23-huawei>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 06:58:18PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> Queued all of the below:
> with one tweaked as per your suggestion and the highlighted one dropped on basis
> I was already carrying the equivalent - as you pointed out.
>
> I was already carrying the required dependency.
>
> Includes the IIO ones in staging.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> p.s. I perhaps foolishly did this in a highly manual way so as to
> also pick up Andy's RB. So might have dropped one...
You could have done:
H=$(git rev-parse @)
b4 am -P 49-190 20221118224540.619276-1-uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
git am ...
git filter-branch -f --msg-filter "grep -v 'Signed-off-by: Jonathan'; echo 'Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>'; echo 'Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>'" $H..
(untested, but you get the idea).
> Definitely would have been better as one patch per subsystem with
> a cover letter suitable for replies like Andy's to be picked up
> by b4.
Next time I will go for one series per subsystem which I like better
than one patch per subsystem.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux ARM (vger)]
[Linux ARM MSM]
[Linux Omap]
[Linux Arm]
[Linux Tegra]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Samsung SOC]
[eCos]
[Linux Fastboot]
[Gcc Help]
[Git]
[DCCP]
[IETF Announce]
[Security]
[Linux MIPS]
[Yosemite Campsites]
|