Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: Add support for the Airoha EN7523 SoC SPI controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/27/22 14:23, Mark Brown wrote:

Hi Mark,

Thanks for reviewing.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:32:28PM +0200, Bert Vermeulen wrote:

+config SPI_AIROHA_EN7523
+	bool "Airoha EN7523 SPI controller support"

Why not tristate?

+	depends on ARCH_AIROHA

I don't see a reason we couldn't have an || COMPILE_TEST here to improve
coverage?

+	default ARCH_AIROHA

In both cases, because SPi boot flash is the only way to boot this SoC that I know of. However as you say this may not be the case on different SoCs, and indeed I believe this SPI core is in lots of stuff already.

So I'll fix this, and also address your other comments.

It's unusual to default a SPI controller on, they tend not to be ultra
critical like a clock driver or similar can be?

+static void __iomem *iobase;

This should be driver data rather than a global, your current SoC might
only have one controller but some other model might build two and it's
fairly trivial to do.

+static void opfifo_write(u32 cmd, u32 len)
+{
+	u32 tmp = ((cmd & 0x1f) << 9) | (len & 0x1ff);
+
+	writel(tmp, REG(ENSPI_MANUAL_OPFIFO_WDATA));
+
+	/* Wait for room in OPFIFO */
+	while (readl(REG(ENSPI_MANUAL_OPFIFO_FULL)))
+		cpu_relax();
+

Some sort of timeout would be good with these loops, if things go wrong
we'll just lock up which isn't good.

+       ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;

Nothing ever reverses this unless clk_set_rate() fails.

+	ret = clk_set_rate(clk, 40000000);
+	if (ret) {
+		clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
+		return ret;
+	}

Could this be pushed into DT via the clock bindings?  The hard coded
number might need to vary by SoC.

+static int xfer_read(struct spi_transfer *xfer)
+{
+	int opcode;
+	uint8_t *buf = xfer->rx_buf;
+
+	switch (xfer->rx_nbits) {
+	case SPI_NBITS_SINGLE:
+		opcode = OP_INS;
+		break;
+	case SPI_NBITS_DUAL:
+		opcode = OP_IND;
+		break;
+	}

This should have a default case that returns an error.

+static int transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctrl, struct spi_message *msg)
+{
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer;
+	int next_xfer_is_rx = 0;
+
+	manual_begin_cmd();
+	set_cs(0);

The driver should not be setting chip select itself, it should just
provide the set_cs() operation to the core and let the core worry about
when to call it.

+	ctrl->transfer_one_message = transfer_one_message;
+	err = devm_spi_register_controller(&pdev->dev, ctrl);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not register SPI controller\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}

Don't discard the error code that registeration returned, include it in
the log message and pass it back to the caller.


--
Bert Vermeulen
bert@xxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux