Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,at91-usart: convert to json-schema

[Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022, Sergiu.Moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On 18.08.2022 11:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > On 17/08/2022 10:55, Sergiu Moga wrote:
> >> Convert at91 USART DT Binding for Atmel/Microchip SoCs to
> >> json-schema format.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   .../bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml        | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>   .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt   |  98 ---------
> >>   2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
> >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> >>   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-usart.txt
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..cf15d73fa1e8
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> > One more thing - I think this should be in serial directory, not mfd,
> > even though it includes SPI. MFD is just a Linux naming/wrapper device.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> 
> I would rather keep it in this directory, since its corresponding driver 
> is also in the mfd directory.

Looks like a UART driver to me.

Which MFD driver does this pertain to?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]