On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: > On 8/10/22 15:23, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:15:08PM +0200, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: > > Yes. Though I'm not clear if the bindings actually want to enforce it > > there, it's a device level property not a controller level one so it > > might not be something where controller support gets validated. > Ah yes, i see, parallel-memories should not be used in our qspi controller node. > So i can't reuse parallel-memories for my purpose. > So i need to add a new proprietary property at controller level as done in the v1 ? Can't the controller figure this out by looking at the properties of the connected devices? You'd need to just return an error if we ever triggered transfer_one_message() on a device that can't support the operation.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature