Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-binding: add Microchip CoreQSPI compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/08/2022 13:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

>> I'm not convinced this is a useful rule to try to enforce, and I'm not
>> sure how well it will work if the same IP is used in several different
>> places.  It's not clear to me what the benefit is intended to be.
> 
> First, the description here is really not adding any useful information.
> 
> "description: Microchip's Polarfire SoC SPI controller."
> Microchip - already in comaptible
> SPI controller - already in compatible and in device description
> 
> The only useful piece could be extending pfs to Polarfire SoC.
> 
> And now imagine every binding doing the same, adding such
> acronym-explanations in every compatible list. Basically we loose easy
> to read, compare, analyze and check for errors enum:
>   enum
>     - microchip,mpfs-spi
>     - microchip,mpfs-qspi
>     - microchip,coreqspi-rtl-v2
>     - microchip,mpfs-some-more-spi
>     - microchip,mpfs-even-newer-spi
> 
> into double-sized oneOf with additional descriptions each one explaining
> "mpfs".
> 
>   oneOf:
>     - description: Microchip's Polarfire SoC SPI controller.
>       const: microchip,mpfs-spi
>     - description: Microchip's Polarfire SoC QSPI controller.
>       const: microchip,mpfs-qspi
>     - description: Microchip's FPGA QSPI controller.
>       const: microchip,coreqspi-rtl-v2

Just to be more specific - this one description actually brings useful
information (FPGA)... This can be easily added as a comment, if anyone
finds it useful:

    enum
      - microchip,mpfs-spi
      - microchip,mpfs-qspi
      - microchip,coreqspi-rtl-v2  # FPGA QSPI

Best regards,
Krzysztof