On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 05:14:45AM -0700, Oleksandr Ocheretnyi wrote: > Originally commit 094d3b9 ("mtd: spi-nor: Add USE_FSR flag for n25q* > entries") and following one 8f93826 ("mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: convert > USE_FSR to a manufacturer flag") enabled SPINOR_OP_RDFSR opcode handling > ability, however some controller drivers still cannot handle it properly > in the micron_st_nor_ready() call what breaks some mtd callbacks with > next error logs: > > mtdblock: erase of region [address1, size1] on "BIOS" failed > mtdblock: erase of region [address2, size2] on "BIOS" failed > > The Intel SPI controller does not support low level operations, like > reading the flag status register (FSR). It only exposes a set of high > level operations for software to use. For this reason check the return > value of micron_st_nor_read_fsr() and if the operation was not > supported, use the status register value only. This allows the chip to > work even when attached to Intel SPI controller (there are such systems > out there). > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Ocheretnyi <oocheret@xxxxxxxxx> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YmZUCIE%2FND82BlNh@lahna/ > --- > PATCH v2 updates PATCH v1 taking into account changes from > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220506105158.43613-1-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > to check -EOPNOTSUPP value from micron_st_nor_read_fsr() as well. > > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > drivers/spi/spi-intel.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c > index a96f74e0f568..fd52e8feea44 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c > @@ -399,8 +399,16 @@ static int micron_st_nor_ready(struct spi_nor *nor) > return sr_ready; > > ret = micron_st_nor_read_fsr(nor, nor->bouncebuf); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > + if (ret < 0) { > + /* > + * Some controllers, such as Intel SPI, do not support low > + * level operations such as reading the flag status > + * register. They only expose small amount of high level > + * operations to the software. If this is the case we use > + * only the status register value. > + */ > + return (ret == -ENOTSUPP || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) ? sr_ready : ret; The -EOPNOTSUPP here is not needed as you change the Intel SPI driver in the below. > + } > > if (nor->bouncebuf[0] & (FSR_E_ERR | FSR_P_ERR)) { > if (nor->bouncebuf[0] & FSR_E_ERR) > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-intel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-intel.c > index 50f42983b950..f0313a718d1b 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-intel.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-intel.c > @@ -352,7 +352,8 @@ static int intel_spi_hw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, size_t len) > val |= HSFSTS_CTL_FCYCLE_RDSR; > break; > default: > - return -EINVAL; > + dev_dbg(ispi->dev, "%#x not supported\n", opcode); > + return -ENOTSUPP; > } > > if (len > INTEL_SPI_FIFO_SZ) > -- > 2.27.0