On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 11:20:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There are several places in the kernel where this kind of functionality is > being used. Provide a generic helper for such cases. This feels really wrong/broken. There should not be any specific ordering of children in the tree. What subsystem relies on this such that they require this? thanks, greg k-h
Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_find_first_child() helper
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_find_first_child() helper
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 13:32:44 +0200
- Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20220607202058.8304-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20220607202058.8304-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_find_first_child() helper
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_find_first_child() helper
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_find_first_child() helper
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] spi: Use device_find_first_child() instead of custom approach
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_find_first_child() helper
- Next by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Replace match_true() by device_match_any()
- Index(es):
 |