Hi Sergey, On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:22 AM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 04:36:48PM -0700, Brad Larson wrote: > > + spi0: spi@2800 { > > + compatible = "pensando,elba-spi"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x2800 0x0 0x100>; > > > + pensando,syscon-spics = <&mssoc 0x2468>; > > I am wondering do you really need to define the > "pensando,syscon-spics" property as accepting a phandle with an > additional argument? That would have been justified if you had at > least two SPI controllers with different CS override registers. AFAICS > you've got only one here. So you can simplify the bindings by defining > the property like "pensando,syscon" (with no "spics" suffix) which > accepts the syscon phandle alone. Respective SPICS offset can be > locally declared in the driver as a macro with respective name. Yes this can be simplified and doing that in updated patchset. Only this API call is needed in dw_spi_elba_init(). syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "pensando,syscon"); Regards, Brad