On 4/22/22 10:56 AM, icenowy@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> > > Allwinner R329 SPI has two controllers, and the second one has helper > functions for MIPI-DBI Type C. > > Add compatible strings for these controllers > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi.yaml > index ca4c95345a49..6354635241fc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi.yaml > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ properties: > oneOf: > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-spi > - const: allwinner,sun8i-h3-spi > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-r329-spi > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-r329-spi-dbi As far as I'm aware, the SPI portion of the DBI controller is register-compatible with the regular SPI controller. So I would expect using that as a fallback compatible for the DBI variant. Regards, Samuel > - items: > - enum: > - allwinner,sun8i-r40-spi >