[PATCH] spi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 9bb5400af205..b7a45a8f8ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -1607,9 +1607,8 @@ static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_controller *ctlr, bool in_kthread)
 	mutex_lock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
 
 	if (!was_busy && ctlr->auto_runtime_pm) {
-		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctlr->dev.parent);
+		ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ctlr->dev.parent);
 		if (ret < 0) {
-			pm_runtime_put_noidle(ctlr->dev.parent);
 			dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
 				ret);
 			mutex_unlock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
@@ -3540,10 +3539,9 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 	}
 
 	if (spi->controller->auto_runtime_pm && spi->controller->set_cs) {
-		status = pm_runtime_get_sync(spi->controller->dev.parent);
+		status = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(spi->controller->dev.parent);
 		if (status < 0) {
 			mutex_unlock(&spi->controller->io_mutex);
-			pm_runtime_put_noidle(spi->controller->dev.parent);
 			dev_err(&spi->controller->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
 				status);
 			return status;
-- 
2.25.1