[PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
index e06aafe169e0..e6e8b062766f 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
@@ -172,9 +172,8 @@ static int ti_qspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 	dev_dbg(qspi->dev, "hz: %d, clock divider %d\n",
 			qspi->spi_max_frequency, clk_div);
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(qspi->dev);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(qspi->dev);
 		dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1