RE: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: spi: Tegra234 QUAD SPI compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Regards
KY

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 23 February 2022 01:57
> To: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Hunter
> <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sowjanya Komatineni
> <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Laxman Dewangan
> <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: spi: Tegra234 QUAD SPI
> compatible
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:26:08PM +0530, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> > Add compatible string for Tegra234 for Tegra QUAD SPI
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/nvidia,tegra210-quad.yaml
> | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions.
Sure. Will do that next time.
> However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
> The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version
> they apply.
> 
I resent the patch as it was not clear to me if this patch can be applied.
I received warning and assumed this cannot be applied without resend.
-- This breaks an x86_64 allmodconfig build
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what
> changed.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux