Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:56:18 +0100
- Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, Amit Kucheria <amitk@xxxxxxxxxx>, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Korsgaard <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>, Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@xxxxxxx>, Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>, William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>, Mark Gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxxx>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>, Benson Leung <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>, Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@xxxxxxxxx>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>, Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@xxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <YgorLXUr8aT+1ttv@smile.fi.intel.com>
- References: <20220212201631.12648-1-s.shtylyov@omp.ru> <20220212201631.12648-2-s.shtylyov@omp.ru> <20220214071351.pcvstrzkwqyrg536@pengutronix.de> <YgorLXUr8aT+1ttv@smile.fi.intel.com>
Hello Andy,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:13:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 08:13:51AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:16:30PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> > > This patch is based on the former Andy Shevchenko's patch:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210331144526.19439-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Currently platform_get_irq_optional() returns an error code even if IRQ
> > > resource simply has not been found. It prevents the callers from being
> > > error code agnostic in their error handling:
> > >
> > > ret = platform_get_irq_optional(...);
> > > if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENXIO)
> > > return ret; // respect deferred probe
> > > if (ret > 0)
> > > ...we get an IRQ...
> > >
> > > All other *_optional() APIs seem to return 0 or NULL in case an optional
> > > resource is not available. Let's follow this good example, so that the
> > > callers would look like:
> > >
> > > ret = platform_get_irq_optional(...);
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > return ret;
> > > if (ret > 0)
> > > ...we get an IRQ...
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
> >
> > While this patch is better than v1, I still don't like it for the
> > reasons discussed for v1. (i.e. 0 isn't usable as a dummy value which I
> > consider the real advantage for the other _get_optional() functions.)
>
> I think you haven't reacted anyhow to my point that you mixing apples and
> bananas together when comparing this 0 to the others _optional APIs.
Is this a question to me or Sergey?
I fully agree, when the 0 of platform_get_irq_optional is an apple and
the NULL of gpio_get_optional is a banana, I doubt "All other
*_optional() APIs seem to return 0 or NULL in case an optional resource
is not available. Let's follow this good example, [...]".
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux ARM (vger)]
[Linux ARM MSM]
[Linux Omap]
[Linux Arm]
[Linux Tegra]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Samsung SOC]
[eCos]
[Linux Fastboot]
[Gcc Help]
[Git]
[DCCP]
[IETF Announce]
[Security]
[Linux MIPS]
[Yosemite Campsites]
|