Re: [PATCH v7 04/14] spi: cadence: Provide a capability structure

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:35:00 +0530
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > 
> > Anyway, do you mind if we move forward first? Not that I don't think
> > that this choice should be discussed further, but I think this can
> > easily be changed in the near future if there is a desire to
> > reorganize spi-mem objects. In fact, these capabilities are accessed
> > through a helper so that hypothetic change would be almost transparent.  
> 
> Okay. I would still like to hear other opinions on this, but fine by me 
> if you want to take this in as-is.

I think we discussed that with Miquel, and I remember complaining about
mixing function pointers and actual data in the spi_mem_ops struct, but
honestly, it's just cosmetic concern, and I don't think it matters much
in practice. So I'm fine either way, make it a field of spi_controller
or spi_mem_ops, spi_mem is definitely not the right place though.