On 22.12.2021 16.59, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 04:27:36PM +0200, Oskari Lemmelä wrote: >> On 22.12.2021 14.32, Mark Brown wrote: >>> Does this actually materially affect what the hardware does? How much >>> data is transferred in an internal loop in the driver is completely >>> immaterial, bits per word only matters for formatting of the transferred >>> data. >> I don't have logic analyzator to verify what hardware actual does. >> I tested this with transferring 32bits to ATSAMD20J15 slave. >> Running loop in 8bits or 16bits, transfer is done correctly without >> any errors. When running loop in 24bits or 32bits directly I got >> error from spi_sync_transfer. > This doesn't inspire confidence TBH. Given the lack of any change in > the interaction with the hardware it doesn't seem likely that the word > length is being changed at any point. Possibly there's a bug somewhere > that needs fixing but it's been misdiagnosed. I did find datasheet for AR9344 and hardware supports shifting bits. 8.25.6 SPI Content to Shift Out or In (SPI_SHIFT_CNT_ADDR) Address: 0x1FFF0014 Access: Read/Write Reset: 0x0 ------------------------------------------- Bit | Bit Name | Desc 31 | SHIFT_EN | Enables shifting data out 30 | SHIFT_CHNL | If set to 1, enables chip select 2 29 | | If set to 1, enables chip select 1 28 | | If set to 1, enables chip select 0 27 | SHIFT_CLKOUT | Initial value of the clock signal 26 | TERMINATE | When set to 1, deassert the chip select 25:7 | RES | Reserved 6:0 | SHIFT_COUNT | The number of bits to be shifted out or shifted in on the data line This is currently implemented in defines #define AR934X_SPI_REG_SHIFT_CTRL 0x14 #define AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_EN BIT(31) #define AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_CS(n) BIT(28 + (n)) #define AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_TERM 26 #define AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_VAL(cs, term, count) \ (AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_EN | AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_CS(cs) | \ (term) << AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_TERM | (count)) In the transfer loop count value is set to number of bits per word. reg = AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_VAL(spi->chip_select, term, trx_cur * 8); iowrite32(reg, sp->base + AR934X_SPI_REG_SHIFT_CTRL); So actually hardware support any word size between 1-32bits. > Note also that the commit log is not good here, now I look at the code > the driver only supports 8 bits per word at the minute and the change > adds support for higher word lengths. If you are seeing an issue that > might point towards what it is. Should I split this in two commits? First one fixing SPI_BPW_MASK(32) typo. Then second commit which implements 8bits, 16bits and 24bits word sizes? Or should driver implement support for any word size between 1-32bits? Oskari