On 12/7/21 9:35 AM, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > On 12/7/21 9:14 AM, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >> >> On 06/12/21 10:59AM, Miquel Raynal wrote: >>> Describe two new memories modes: >>> - A stacked mode when the bus is common but the address space extended >>> with an additinals wires. >>> - A parallel mode with parallel busses accessing parallel flashes where >>> the data is spread. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml >>> index 5dd209206e88..13aa6a2374c9 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml >>> @@ -82,6 +82,27 @@ properties: >>> description: >>> Delay, in microseconds, after a write transfer. >>> >>> + stacked-memories: >>> + type: boolean >> >> I don't think a boolean is enough to completely describe the memory. >> Sure, you say the memories are stacked, but where do you specify when to >> switch the CS? They could be two 512 MiB memories, two 1 GiB memories, >> or one 512 MiB and one 256 MiB. > > If the multi-die flash contains identical dies then the die boundary can be > determined with flash_size / number_of_cs. Are there any multi die flashes but the problem is there, yes, there is still the case where there are stacked devices with a single cs. We'll need to describe the size of the die in some way.