Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] spi: dw: Replace DWC_HSSI capability with IP-core version checker

[Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 05:19:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 5:08 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > >  /* DW SPI controller capabilities */
> > > >  #define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE             BIT(0)
> > > >  #define DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST             BIT(1)
> > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI                BIT(2)
> > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32           BIT(3)
> > > > +#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32           BIT(2)
> >
> > > In one patch you move this in the file upper.
> > > Here you reshuffling it due to dropping one bit.
> > >
> > > Now I'm wondering if you may split these two into a separate patch, which
> > > brings us to simple
> > >
> > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI          BIT(3)
> > >
> > > here.
> >
> > I can change the bit-numbers assignment in the previous patch, which
> > moves this block of macros up to the top of the file. Thus we'll
> > have just a single
> > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI            BIT(3)
> > here. What do you think? Is that what you meant?
> 
> I think that reassignment doesn't fit the previous patch per se, hence
> I proposed to have yet another one,

> But in any case it's a minor
> thingy.

Since I have to resend the series one more time I'll do as you
suggested and unpin the bit numbering change into a separate patch.

-Sergey

> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko