Re: [PATCH] spi: fix use-after-free of the add_lock mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:46:01PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2021-11-11 13:37, schrieb Mark Brown:

> > If you are sending a new version of something please flag that in the
> > commit message, this helps both people and automated systems identify
> > that this is a new version of the same thing.

> Are RFC patches eligible to be picked up? I wasn't sure if I had to
> resend it at all. But since there was a mistake in the commit message
> anyway, I went ahead and the the first "real" version. How would
> you flag that? Isn't changing the subject from "[PATCH RFC]" (ok it
> was "RFC PATCH", my bad) to "[PATCH]" enough?

No, both people and machines are going to get confused.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux