Hi Conor, On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add mpfs-soc to clear undocumented binding warning > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml > index 3f981e897126..1ff7a5224bbc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties: > - enum: > - microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit > - const: microchip,mpfs > + - const: microchip,mpfs-soc Doesn't the "s" in "mpfs" already stand for "soc"? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds