On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 05:39:31PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Up to now tsc200x_remove() returns zero unconditionally. Make it return > void instead which makes it easier to see in the callers that there is > no error to handle. > > Also the return value of i2c and spi remove callbacks is ignored anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thank you. -- Dmitry
Re: [PATCH v2 06/20] input: touchscreen: tsc200x: Make tsc200x_remove() return void
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/20] input: touchscreen: tsc200x: Make tsc200x_remove() return void
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:45:48 -0700
- Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20211012153945.2651412-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References: <20211012153945.2651412-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20211012153945.2651412-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References:
- [PATCH v2 00/20] Make some spi device drivers return zero in .remove()
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH v2 06/20] input: touchscreen: tsc200x: Make tsc200x_remove() return void
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH v2 00/20] Make some spi device drivers return zero in .remove()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] input: adxl34xx: Make adxl34x_remove() return void
- Next by Date: Re: Deadlock in spi_add_device() -- device core problem
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 06/20] input: touchscreen: tsc200x: Make tsc200x_remove() return void
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 03/20] gpio: mc33880: Drop if with an always false condition
- Index(es):
 |