[PATCH 1/4] spi: Move comment about chipselect check to the right place

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The part of the comment about locking isn't that relevant compared to
the chip select check. So drop the sentence about locking.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index aea037c65985..ff4254dc64af 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -564,6 +564,11 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 	struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
 	int status;
 
+	/*
+	 * We need to make sure there's no other device with this
+	 * chipselect **BEFORE** we call setup(), else we'll trash
+	 * its configuration.
+	 */
 	status = bus_for_each_dev(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi, spi_dev_check);
 	if (status) {
 		dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n",
@@ -632,10 +637,6 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 	/* Set the bus ID string */
 	spi_dev_set_name(spi);
 
-	/* We need to make sure there's no other device with this
-	 * chipselect **BEFORE** we call setup(), else we'll trash
-	 * its configuration.  Lock against concurrent add() calls.
-	 */
 	mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock);
 	status = __spi_add_device(spi);
 	mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock);
-- 
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux