On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 05:27:58AM +0800, mahesh.r.vaidya@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Mahesh R Vaidya <mahesh.r.vaidya@xxxxxxxxx> > > Enable and set Autosuspend delay for SPI DesignWare driver. > The number 1000 ms for the autosuspend delay was picked a bit > arbitrarily, so if someone has measurements showing a better > value we could easily change this. > > Signed-off-by: Mahesh R Vaidya <mahesh.r.vaidya@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > index 3379720cfcb8..8b588ce9c16b 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ struct dw_spi_mmio { > struct reset_control *rstc; > }; > > +#define SPI_DW_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSP_VAL 1000 > + > #define MSCC_CPU_SYSTEM_CTRL_GENERAL_CTRL 0x24 > #define OCELOT_IF_SI_OWNER_OFFSET 4 > #define JAGUAR2_IF_SI_OWNER_OFFSET 6 > @@ -309,6 +311,10 @@ static int dw_spi_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto out; > } > > + /* Set initial autosuspend default delay value and enable */ > + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, SPI_DW_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSP_VAL); > + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev); Seems reasonable, but doesn't it need to be reverted in the remove callback? Like it's done in the spi-imx.c driver for instance by calling the pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() method. > pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev); > > ret = dw_spi_add_host(&pdev->dev, dws); > @@ -319,6 +325,7 @@ static int dw_spi_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > > out: > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev); This doesn't seem like related to the subject, thus needs to be submitted as a separate patch with fixes tag if it fixes some another problem. Additionally it isn't balanced with the pm_runtime_get*() method invocation. Am I missing something? -Sergey > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); > clk_disable_unprepare(dwsmmio->pclk); > out_clk: > -- > 2.17.1 >