On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:08:40 +0200 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Apurva, > > Boris, you might have a good idea for the naming discussed below? {patch,adjust,tweak}_op() all sound good to me. This being said, I'm a bit concerned about doing this op tweaking in the hot-path. Looks like something that should be done at probe or when switching to 8D mode, and kept around. The alternative would be to have per-mode op tables, which I think would be clearer.