Re: [PATCH v8 20/34] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Add runtime PM and OPP support

[Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>]

19.08.2021 20:03, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:27:40AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> The SDHCI on Tegra belongs to the core power domain and we're going to
>> enable GENPD support for the core domain. Now SDHCI must be resumed using
>> runtime PM API in order to initialize the SDHCI power state. The SDHCI
>> clock rate must be changed using OPP API that will reconfigure the power
>> domain performance state in accordance to the rate. Add runtime PM and OPP
>> support to the SDHCI driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
>> index 387ce9cdbd7c..a3583359c972 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>>  #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
>> @@ -24,6 +26,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>>  #include <linux/ktime.h>
>>  
>> +#include <soc/tegra/common.h>
>> +
>>  #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
>>  #include "cqhci.h"
>>  
>> @@ -123,6 +127,12 @@
>>  					 SDHCI_TRNS_BLK_CNT_EN | \
>>  					 SDHCI_TRNS_DMA)
>>  
>> +enum {
>> +	TEGRA_CLK_BULK_SDHCI,
>> +	TEGRA_CLK_BULK_TMCLK,
>> +	TEGRA_CLK_BULK_NUM,
>> +};
>> +
>>  struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data {
>>  	const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata;
>>  	u64 dma_mask;
>> @@ -171,6 +181,8 @@ struct sdhci_tegra {
>>  	bool enable_hwcq;
>>  	unsigned long curr_clk_rate;
>>  	u8 tuned_tap_delay;
>> +
>> +	struct clk_bulk_data clocks[TEGRA_CLK_BULK_NUM];
> 
> This doesn't seem worth it to me. There's a lot of churn in this driver
> that's only needed to convert this to the clk_bulk API and it makes the
> code a lot more difficult to read, in my opinion.
> 
> It looks like the only benefit that this gives us is that runtime
> suspend and resume become a few lines shorter.

The driver probe code looks cleaner with that. You should be looking at
the final result and not at the patch to see it.