Re: [PATCH v8 01/34] opp: Add dev_pm_opp_sync() helper

[Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>]

18.08.2021 07:29, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 18.08.2021 07:12, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>> 18.08.2021 06:55, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>>> On 17-08-21, 18:49, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 17.08.2021 10:55, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>>>> ...
>>>>>> +int dev_pm_opp_sync(struct device *dev)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +	struct opp_table *opp_table;
>>>>>> +	struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>>>>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	/* Device may not have OPP table */
>>>>>> +	opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
>>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
>>>>>> +		return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (!_get_opp_count(opp_table))
>>>>>> +		goto put_table;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	opp = _find_current_opp(dev, opp_table);
>>>>>> +	ret = _set_opp(dev, opp_table, opp, opp->rate);
>>>>>
>>>>> And I am not sure how this will end up working, since new OPP will be
>>>>> equal to old one. Since I see you call this from resume() at many
>>>>> places.
>>>>
>>>> Initially OPP table is "uninitialized" and opp_table->enabled=false,
>>>> hence the first sync always works even if OPP is equal to old one. Once
>>>> OPP has been synced, all further syncs are NO-OPs, hence it doesn't
>>>> matter how many times syncing is called.
>>>>
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.14-rc6/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L1012
>>>
>>> Right, but how will this work from Resume ? Won't that be a no-op ?
>>
>> The first resume initializes the OPP state on sync, all further syncs on
>> resume are no-ops.
>>
> 
> Notice that we use GENPD here. GENPD core takes care of storing PD's
> performance state (voltage in case of Tegra) and dropping it to 0 after
> rpm-suspend, GENPD core also restores the state before rpm-resume.

By 'here' I mean in this series.