Hi Apurva, Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@xxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 13 Jul 2021 13:05:29 +0000: > In Octal DTR SPI mode, 2 bytes of data gets transmitted over one clock > cycle, and half-cycle instruction phases aren't supported yet. So, > every DTR spi_mem_op needs to have even nbytes in all phases for > non-erratic behaviour from the SPI controller. > > The odd length cmd and dummy phases get handled by spimem_setup_op() > but the odd length address and data phases need to be handled according > to the use case. For example in Octal DTR mode, read register operation > has one byte long address and data phase. So it needs to extend it > by adding a suitable extra byte in addr and reading 2 bytes of data, > discarding the second byte. > > Handle address and data phases for Octal DTR mode in read/write > register and write volatile configuration register operations > by adding a suitable extra byte in the address and data phase. > > Create spimem_setup_reg_op() helper function to ease setting up > read/write register operations in other functions, e.g. wait(). > > Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > index 2e59faecc8f5..a5334ad34f96 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > @@ -65,12 +65,27 @@ static void spinand_setup_op(const struct spinand_device *spinand, > } > } > > +static void spinand_setup_reg_op(const struct spinand_device *spinand, > + struct spi_mem_op *op) Same remark about the naming. In fact I believe we could have this logic in _setup_op() (or whatever its name) and add a specific parameter for it? > +{ > + if (spinand->reg_proto == SPINAND_OCTAL_DTR) { > + /* > + * Assigning same first and second byte will result in constant > + * bits on ths SPI bus between positive and negative clock edges the > + */ > + op->addr.val = (op->addr.val << 8) | op->addr.val; I am not sure to understand what you do here? > + op->addr.nbytes = 2; > + op->data.nbytes = 2; > + } Space > + spinand_setup_op(spinand, op); > +} > + > static int spinand_read_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 *val) > { > - struct spi_mem_op op = SPINAND_GET_FEATURE_OP(reg, > - spinand->scratchbuf); > + struct spi_mem_op op = SPINAND_GET_FEATURE_OP(reg, spinand->scratchbuf); You can do this, but in a different commit. > int ret; > > + spinand_setup_reg_op(spinand, &op); > ret = spi_mem_exec_op(spinand->spimem, &op); > if (ret) > return ret; > @@ -81,10 +96,10 @@ static int spinand_read_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 *val) > > static int spinand_write_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 val) > { > - struct spi_mem_op op = SPINAND_SET_FEATURE_OP(reg, > - spinand->scratchbuf); > + struct spi_mem_op op = SPINAND_SET_FEATURE_OP(reg, spinand->scratchbuf); Same here. > > - *spinand->scratchbuf = val; > + spinand_setup_reg_op(spinand, &op); > + memset(spinand->scratchbuf, val, op.data.nbytes); > return spi_mem_exec_op(spinand->spimem, &op); > } > > @@ -547,6 +562,7 @@ static int spinand_wait(struct spinand_device *spinand, > u8 status; > int ret; > > + spinand_setup_reg_op(spinand, &op); > ret = spi_mem_poll_status(spinand->spimem, &op, STATUS_BUSY, 0, > initial_delay_us, > poll_delay_us, Thanks, Miquèl