On 2021/07/13 21:25, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 07:23:12AM +0000, Yoshitaka Ikeda wrote: >> Fix below division by zero warning: >> - Added an if statement because buswidth can be zero, resulting in division by zero. >> - The modified code was based on another driver (atmel-quadspi). >> >> [ 0.795337] Division by zero in kernel. >> [ 0.797878] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-xxx-xxxx+ #1 >> [ 0.803782] Hardware name: Altera SOCFPGA >> [ 0.806481] Backtrace: >> [ 0.807628] [<807fd2b0>] (dump_backtrace) from [<807fd554>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) > > Please think hard before including complete backtraces in upstream > reports, they are very large and contain almost no useful information > relative to their size so often obscure the relevant content in your > message. If part of the backtrace is usefully illustrative (it often is > for search engines if nothing else) then it's usually better to pull out > the relevant sections. Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I too think that the tracing part should be limited to the useful range. I would like to modify the tracing part as follows and repost it. Do you think I should narrow it down further or do you think it is too narrow? Or unnecessary? [ 0.795337] Division by zero in kernel. : [ 0.834051] [<807fd40c>] (__div0) from [<804e1acc>] (Ldiv0+0x8/0x10) [ 0.839097] [<805f0710>] (cqspi_exec_mem_op) from [<805edb4c>] (spi_mem_exec_op+0x3b0/0x3f8)