Re: [PATCH v14 08/12] spi: imx: remove ERR009165 workaround on i.mx6ul

[Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am Dienstag, dem 13.07.2021 um 09:12 +0000 schrieb Robin Gong:
> On 12/07/21 17:31 Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > Am Montag, dem 12.07.2021 um 03:48 +0000 schrieb Robin Gong:
> > > On 09/07/21 17:42 Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 07.04.2021 um 23:30 +0800 schrieb Robin Gong:
> > > > > ERR009165 fixed on i.mx6ul/6ull/6sll. All other i.mx6/7 and
> > > > > i.mx8m/8mm still need this errata. Please refer to nxp official
> > > > > errata document from
> > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> > > > w.n
> > xp.com%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cyibin.gong%40nxp.com%7C48156bc93d
> > > > 
> > c84ac26e9d08d942bdc0ac%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> > > > 
> > 7C1%7C637614205017900475%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4
> > > > 
> > wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&a
> > > > 
> > mp;sdata=keYQubzt1jWrKhaxXr40RL41vzFuIn7x1Sasa3p%2F9Xo%3D&amp;res
> > > > erved=0 .
> > > > > 
> > > > > For removing workaround on those chips. Add new i.mx6ul type.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 47
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c index
> > > > > cf235b9..d18ee25 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> > > > > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ enum spi_imx_devtype {
> > > > >  	IMX35_CSPI,	/* CSPI on all i.mx except above */
> > > > >  	IMX51_ECSPI,	/* ECSPI on i.mx51 */
> > > > >  	IMX53_ECSPI,	/* ECSPI on i.mx53 and later */
> > > > > +	IMX6UL_ECSPI,	/* ERR009165 fix from i.mx6ul */
> > > > 
> > > > This patch could be a lot smaller if you didn't introduce a new
> > > > devtype. You could just use the IMX51_ECSPI in
> > > > imx6ul_ecspi_devtype_data, as all you care about as a relevant
> > > > difference is the tx_glitch_fixed property, which isn't tied to the devtype.
> > > I knew tx_glitch_fixed was enough but I still prefer to add new
> > > 'IMX6UL_ECSPI' because we can clearly choose the right IP which has
> > > fix the issue while legacy IMX51 if it's not fixed by dts.
> > > 
> > Sorry, I don't follow this reasoning. You are not using the new IMX6UL_ECSPI
> > devtype in any way in this patch, other than a single location, where you just
> > handle it the same as the IMX51_ECSPI devtype.
> Okay, will reuse IMX51_ECSPI as devtype, but will still keep "fsl,imx6ul-ecspi".
> 
That's exactly what I meant: have a "fsl,imx6ul-ecspi" compatible with
it's own imx6ul_ecspi_devtype_data, but reuse the IMX51_ECSPI devtype.

Glad we are on the same page now.

Regards,
Lucas