Re: [PATCH 2/7] spi: spi-ep93xx: Prepare clock before using it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:30:36AM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Use clk_prepare_enable()/clk_disable_unprepare() in preparation for switch
> to Common Clock Framework, otherwise the following is visible:
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:1011 clk_core_enable+0x9c/0xbc
> Enabling unprepared ep93xx-spi.0
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Tainted: G        W         5.13.0-rc5-... #1
> Hardware name: Cirrus Logic EDB9302 Evaluation Board
> [<c000d5b0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000c590>] (show_stack+0x10/0x18)
> [<c000c590>] (show_stack) from [<c03a5f38>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x2c)
> [<c03a5f38>] (dump_stack) from [<c03a2098>] (__warn+0x98/0xc0)
> [<c03a2098>] (__warn) from [<c03a2150>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x90/0xc0)
> [<c03a2150>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c01d8358>] (clk_core_enable+0x9c/0xbc)
> [<c01d8358>] (clk_core_enable) from [<c01d8698>] (clk_core_enable_lock+0x18/0x30)
> [<c01d8698>] (clk_core_enable_lock) from [<c023eeb4>] (ep93xx_spi_prepare_hardware+0x10/0x30)

Please think hard before including complete backtraces in upstream
reports, they are very large and contain almost no useful information
relative to their size so often obscure the relevant content in your
message. If part of the backtrace is usefully illustrative (it often is
for search engines if nothing else) then it's usually better to pull out
the relevant sections.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux