Hi Rob, Similar to the Rockchip SFC discussion this compatible does currently not add any data or difference to the driver. Therefore a simple fallback string will do for now. That in the past that was not strictly enforced, so be it. Could you have a look at it? Kind regards, Johan Jonker https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20210607063448.29589-1-jon.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#e202225dbe50829069becd2915267124f379bf2fe - rockchip,rk3368-spi - rockchip,rk3399-spi - rockchip,rv1126-spi - const: rockchip,rk3066-spi On 6/10/21 6:06 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 19:18:32 +0800, Jon Lin wrote: >> The description below will be used for rv1126.dtsi or compatible one in >> the future >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Lin <jon.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Changes in v6: >> - Consider to compatibility, the "rockchip,rk3568-spi" is removed in >> Series-changes v5, so the commit massage should also remove the >> corresponding information >> >> Changes in v5: >> - Change to leave one compatible id rv1126, and rk3568 is compatible >> with rv1126 >> >> Changes in v4: >> - Adjust the order patches >> - Simply commit massage like redundancy "application" content >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Fix compile error which is find by Sascha in [v2,2/8] >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip >