On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 07:41:36PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > compared to v6 I rebased to v5.13-rc1 (which resulted in a conflict in > the pwm-atmel patch), reformated the doc comments in patch 2 (as > suggested by Jonathan Cameron) and added the two Reviewed-by tags for > Jonathan Cameron. Another two weeks without maintainer feedback. I didn't find a single mail by either Michael Turquette nor by Stephen Boyd on the linux-clk list on lore dating from this month. This patch set didn't get a reply since more than half a year. Is the clk tree still maintained? Would a pull request help? There are several people who expressed interest in this series and the cleanup it allows. @Andrew: Would you be willing to take the first two patches if Michael and Stephen don't react in the near future? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature