Hello, the only change since v5 is that the fixed i2c patch is now properly part of this series. Can I please get a feedback by the clock maintainers? The series got positive feedback by several people now and is still unreplied by by the clk maintainers since October. Should I resend regularly, say once per two weeks? How many digits do I have to consider for the resend counter? At what point can I ask the maintainers further up in the chain to merge my series? Does a pull request help? Best regards Uwe Uwe Kleine-König (6): clk: generalize devm_clk_get() a bit clk: Provide new devm_clk_helpers for prepared and enabled clocks pwm: atmel: Simplify using devm_clk_get_prepared() rtc: at91sma9: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled() i2c: imx: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enableded() spi: davinci: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled() drivers/clk/clk-devres.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 12 +---- drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 15 +----- drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 22 ++------- drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c | 11 +---- include/linux/clk.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 6 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) base-commit: a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15 -- 2.30.2