[PATCH v5 0/6] clk: provide new devm helpers for prepared and enabled clocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

the only change since v5 is that the fixed i2c patch is now properly
part of this series.

Can I please get a feedback by the clock maintainers? The series got
positive feedback by several people now and is still unreplied by by the
clk maintainers since October. Should I resend regularly, say once per
two weeks? How many digits do I have to consider for the resend counter?
At what point can I ask the maintainers further up in the chain to merge
my series? Does a pull request help?

Best regards
Uwe

Uwe Kleine-König (6):
  clk: generalize devm_clk_get() a bit
  clk: Provide new devm_clk_helpers for prepared and enabled clocks
  pwm: atmel: Simplify using devm_clk_get_prepared()
  rtc: at91sma9: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()
  i2c: imx: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enableded()
  spi: davinci: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()

 drivers/clk/clk-devres.c     | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 12 +----
 drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c      | 15 +-----
 drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c   | 22 ++-------
 drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c    | 11 +----
 include/linux/clk.h          | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)


base-commit: a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15
-- 
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux