For the header file comment? I think it's actually backwards since `devm_allocated = true` would indicate the device is managed with devres. Should I send a followup change or v2? On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:20 AM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, April 7, 2021, William A. Kennington III <wak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> We can't rely on the contents of the devres list during >> spi_unregister_controller(), as the list is already torn down at the >> time we perform devres_find() for devm_spi_release_controller. This >> causes devices registered with devm_spi_alloc_{master,slave}() to be >> mistakenly identified as legacy, non-devm managed devices and have their >> reference counters decremented below 0. >> >> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 660 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x108/0x174 >> [<b0396f04>] (refcount_warn_saturate) from [<b03c56a4>] (kobject_put+0x90/0x98) >> [<b03c5614>] (kobject_put) from [<b0447b4c>] (put_device+0x20/0x24) >> r4:b6700140 >> [<b0447b2c>] (put_device) from [<b07515e8>] (devm_spi_release_controller+0x3c/0x40) >> [<b07515ac>] (devm_spi_release_controller) from [<b045343c>] (release_nodes+0x84/0xc4) >> r5:b6700180 r4:b6700100 >> [<b04533b8>] (release_nodes) from [<b0454160>] (devres_release_all+0x5c/0x60) >> r8:b1638c54 r7:b117ad94 r6:b1638c10 r5:b117ad94 r4:b163dc10 >> [<b0454104>] (devres_release_all) from [<b044e41c>] (__device_release_driver+0x144/0x1ec) >> r5:b117ad94 r4:b163dc10 >> [<b044e2d8>] (__device_release_driver) from [<b044f70c>] (device_driver_detach+0x84/0xa0) >> r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:b117ad94 r6:b163dc54 r5:b1638c10 r4:b163dc10 >> [<b044f688>] (device_driver_detach) from [<b044d274>] (unbind_store+0xe4/0xf8) >> >> Instead, determine the devm allocation state as a flag on the >> controller which is guaranteed to be stable during cleanup. >> >> Fixes: 5e844cc37a5c ("spi: Introduce device-managed SPI controller allocation") >> Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <wak@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/spi/spi.c | 9 ++------- >> include/linux/spi/spi.h | 3 +++ >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c >> index b08efe88ccd6..904a353798b6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c >> @@ -2496,6 +2496,7 @@ struct spi_controller *__devm_spi_alloc_controller(struct device *dev, >> >> ctlr = __spi_alloc_controller(dev, size, slave); >> if (ctlr) { >> + ctlr->devm_allocated = true; >> *ptr = ctlr; >> devres_add(dev, ptr); >> } else { >> @@ -2842,11 +2843,6 @@ int devm_spi_register_controller(struct device *dev, >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_spi_register_controller); >> >> -static int devm_spi_match_controller(struct device *dev, void *res, void *ctlr) >> -{ >> - return *(struct spi_controller **)res == ctlr; >> -} >> - >> static int __unregister(struct device *dev, void *null) >> { >> spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev)); >> @@ -2893,8 +2889,7 @@ void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr) >> /* Release the last reference on the controller if its driver >> * has not yet been converted to devm_spi_alloc_master/slave(). >> */ >> - if (!devres_find(ctlr->dev.parent, devm_spi_release_controller, >> - devm_spi_match_controller, ctlr)) >> + if (!ctlr->devm_allocated) >> put_device(&ctlr->dev); >> >> /* free bus id */ >> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h >> index 592897fa4f03..643139b1eafe 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h >> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h >> @@ -510,6 +510,9 @@ struct spi_controller { >> >> #define SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS BIT(5) /* GPIO CS must select slave */ >> >> + /* flag indicating this is a non-devres managed controller */ > > > > Isn’t “non-“ part confusing a lot? > >> >> + bool devm_allocated; >> + >> /* flag indicating this is an SPI slave controller */ >> bool slave; >> >> -- >> 2.31.0.208.g409f899ff0-goog >> > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >