On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:57:27AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Thanks. I wonder what you think about this series. Is it more "Well, ok, > if you must, the change you did to this spi driver looks correct." or > "This is a good simplification and a similar change for nearly all other > spi drivers that make use of a clk is possible, too. Dear clk > maintainers, please go forward and apply this useful series."? Well, I know there's demand for devm enables of things and for some simpler drivers it is actually the pattern people use but I find it hard to get enthusiastic about the pattern, it really only works for the extremely simple case where things get turned on in probe and never touched afterwards.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
