On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:15:06PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 06:08:17AM +0000, Kuldeep Singh wrote: > > Compatible entries in conjugation require enum and const pair. > > For example, ls1012a.dtsi uses compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-dspi","fsl,ls1021a-v1.0-dspi"; > > Same goes for LS1028 as well. > > > > Therefore, can't mention the compatible entry as single entity otherwise > > it may fail "make dt_binding_check" and "make dtbs_check". > > > > > > > > > +examples: > > > > + - | > > > > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/fsl,qoriq-clockgen.h> > > > > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > > > > + > > > > + soc { > > > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > > > + > > > > + spi@2100000 { > > > > + compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-dspi", "fsl,ls1021a-v1.0-dspi"; > > > > > > This doesn't need the "fsl,ls1021a-v1.0-dspi" compatible, can you please remove > > > it? > > > > I have taken this example from LS1028a.dtsi and it uses these compatibles in conjugation. > > If "fsl,ls1021a-v1.0-dspi" is not required, then it should also be removed from device-tree > > As well as from bindings both. > > Yes, the second compatible is never required by the driver and should be > removed from existing device trees if that makes "make dtbs_check" fail. Can you say that is true for every possible driver implementation? u-boot, *BSD, etc.? Rob