Re: [PATCH 0/4] spi: Adding support for software nodes

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:28:10 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> The older API used to supply additional device properties for the
> devices - so mainly the function device_add_properties() - is going to
> be removed. The reason why the API will be removed is because it gives
> false impression that the properties are assigned directly to the
> devices, which has actually never been the case - the properties have
> always been assigned to a software fwnode which was then just directly
> linked with the device when the old API was used. By only accepting
> device properties instead of complete software nodes, the subsystems
> remove any change of taking advantage of the other features the
> software nodes have.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/4] spi: Add support for software nodes
      commit: 47afc77bbfeac163d81c7a675d608c18561aa680
[2/4] ARM: pxa: icontrol: Constify the software node
      commit: 2df0c4a640c55c0eff7f97907b98ad6fdfedd226
[3/4] ARM: pxa: zeus: Constify the software node
      commit: d4272a7adf26c62c5afe86b6829712de519b4a26
[4/4] spi: Remove support for dangling device properties
      commit: df41a5dad586c8ead1bb7082b4b6fcb563e02199

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark